Wow. Here is a new reason for male-envy in slash fandom I've never quite seen expressed this way before:
Fandom Secrets thread about a post in which a fan envies male characters for not being expected to remove their pubic hair and the comments thereof, in which I'm happily wanking away.
I find it disturbing, though. Really?
Really? I always thought of shaved/waxed-off pubes as a kink that some people are into and some people aren't, not a basic expectation. Might be practical if you're a pro swimmer or swimsuit model or bicycle racer, but...is this really as mainstream these days as this poster seems to think? Hell, when I first became sexually active, it wasn't even all that common in porn! I don't shave, and I have certainly never been kicked out of bed for it - but I
did try it for kicks to surprise a partner once, and he was so squicked out by it I got NO action at all until it grew back! (His quote: "WHY?!? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT?!?!? I LIKE
WOMEN, NOT LITTLE GIRLS, EW EW EW EW!" Again, YKINMK, and it's fine if it's yours...but wow, don't assume it's everyone's!)
I wonder if it's generational.
***
On the other side of the pelvis,
Oh look, another popular pro author is having a meltdown over fanfiction and showing her ass all over the Internet (Diana Gabaldon)
SIGH.
I want to thank
wintercreek* for this fabulous post where she is working to compile a list of
authors who are supportive of fanfic, or at least pragmatic and rational about it. When it's all done, I'll print it out and take it to the bookstore with me when I'm looking to follow up on recs and discover new authors to love.
Some of the defensive commenters on Gabaldon's blog have referred to angry fen saying they're not going to buy her books anymore as committing "blackmail." Hell no. No reader
owes any author her money and attention and mental real estate. Blackmail is a crime, and there is no crime in declining to buy a book.
But my reason for not buying the books of authors who have insulting tantrums about fic writers and compare them to stalkers and thieves and homewreckers, as DG does in her rant, is kind of self-serving too. Any time I pick up a book, there is a chance that I will love it in that particular way that inspires me to work with the story. I don't know why some books I love do this and others don't. But the simple truth is, I know I'm better off staying out of the psychic playgrounds created by authors who hate "my kind" and think my way of interacting with the media I love is comparable to trespassing or sexual harassment. It's indicative of an attitude about the creative process itself that is deeply at odds with mine, and that's one of those
political differences (you bet it is) that I can't quite get around. I just don't need that kind of crap in my creative life, especially when there are so many great authors I am more compatible with still out there to be discovered.
*I don't think wintercreek is on LJ anymore - if you're reading this first on LJ, just follow the other link to her DW and you'll see her post.